WATERPIK
Βλέποντας τους κινδύνους που έχουν ορισμένα οδοντικά νήματα, αποφάσισα να διερευνήσω εναλλακτικές, και κάνοντας μία μικρή έρευνα βρήκα τις παρακάτω πληροφορίες, οι οποίες φαίνονται αρκετά πειστικές για τα οφέλη του waterpik, ιδίως όταν υποστηρίζονται και από τον Αμερικάνικο Σύλλογο Οδοντιάτρων
Σε κάθε περίπτωση, συμβουλευτείτε τον οδοντίατρο σας
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
– Consumers for the first time can use a powered interdental cleaner that carries the ADA Seal of Acceptance.
The ADA Council On Scientific Affairs awarded the ADA Seal of Acceptance to five Waterpik based on its finding that they are safe and have shown efficacy for removing plaque along the gumline and between teeth and for helping to prevent and reduce gingivitis.
To earn the Seal, Water Pik, Inc. demonstrated, through providing scientific data, clinical studies and results of laboratory tests, that it meets ADA requirements for product safety and efficacy in the ADA Seal Program’s Powered Interdental Cleaners category.
The Water Flosser product lines that earned the Seal are the Waterpik Aquarius Professional, the Waterpik Aquarius Professional Designer Series, the Waterpik Ultra, the Waterpik Nano and the Waterpik Traveler.
https://www.ada.org/en/publications/ada-news/2017-archive/february/waterpik-water-flosser-first-in-its-class-to-earn-ada-seal
– Whether you use floss or another interdental cleaner is a personal preference, but it’s very important to understand the proper technique for each tool so that it is effective
https://www.ada.org/en/press-room/news-releases/2016-archive/august/statement-from-the-american-dental-association-about-interdental-cleaners
– To date there are a total of five clinical studies that compare the Water Flosser to string floss, consistently demonstrating that water flossing is more effective than string flossing for better oral health
https://www.nature.com/articles/sj.bdj.2016.653
– The Waterpik Water Flosser and manual toothbrush is significantly more effective than a manual brush and string floss in removing plaque from tooth surfaces
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24282867/
– oral irrigation with water has therapeutic benefits in periodontitis
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10703660/
– There are 70 published research articles that unequivocally show it is safe and effective to use
https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/what-to-do-when-the-evidence-is-lacking/
– When it comes to safety, the water flosser is supported by more than 60 clinical trials and five decades of use by the public. (8) A 2015 review of the safety profile on the water flosser found significant evidence to dispel the myth that water flossing may harm tissues
https://www.dentistryiq.com/products/hygiene/article/16352912/skeptical-about-recommending-a-water-flosser-you-are-not-alone
– The American Dental Association says water flossers with the ADA Seal of Acceptance can get rid of plaque
https://www.webmd.com/oral-health/what-is-waterpik#1
– Research shows that the water flosser does not push bacteria into the periodontal pocket; in fact, the reverse is true
https://www.aegisdentalnetwork.com/cced/2012/04/relevance-of-the-water-flosser-50-years-of-data
– The Waterpik® Water Flosser is clinically proven significantly more effective in numerous independent and university-based studies.
https://www.waterpik.ca/en/oral-health/pro/clinical-research/water-flosser/
https://www.waterpik.ca/en/oral-health/pro/clinical-research/water-flosser/plaque-removal/
– Over 50% More Effective than String Floss for Reducing Gingivitis
https://www.waterpik.com/oral-health/pro/clinical-research/dental-floss-vs-water-flosser-reducing-gingivitis-plaque-barnes-2005/
– Twice as Effective as String Floss for Reducing Gingival Bleeding
https://www.waterpik.com/oral-health/pro/clinical-research/dental-floss-vs-water-flossing-reduce-gingival-bleeding-rosema-2011/
– 29% more effective than string floss for overall plaque removal
https://www.waterpik.com/oral-health/pro/clinical-research/Goyal-Waterpik-vs-String-Floss-for-Plaque-Removal-2013/
Σε κάθε περίπτωση, συμβουλευτείτε τον οδοντίατρο σας
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
– Consumers for the first time can use a powered interdental cleaner that carries the ADA Seal of Acceptance.
The ADA Council On Scientific Affairs awarded the ADA Seal of Acceptance to five Waterpik based on its finding that they are safe and have shown efficacy for removing plaque along the gumline and between teeth and for helping to prevent and reduce gingivitis.
To earn the Seal, Water Pik, Inc. demonstrated, through providing scientific data, clinical studies and results of laboratory tests, that it meets ADA requirements for product safety and efficacy in the ADA Seal Program’s Powered Interdental Cleaners category.
The Water Flosser product lines that earned the Seal are the Waterpik Aquarius Professional, the Waterpik Aquarius Professional Designer Series, the Waterpik Ultra, the Waterpik Nano and the Waterpik Traveler.
https://www.ada.org/en/publications/ada-news/2017-archive/february/waterpik-water-flosser-first-in-its-class-to-earn-ada-seal
– Whether you use floss or another interdental cleaner is a personal preference, but it’s very important to understand the proper technique for each tool so that it is effective
https://www.ada.org/en/press-room/news-releases/2016-archive/august/statement-from-the-american-dental-association-about-interdental-cleaners
– To date there are a total of five clinical studies that compare the Water Flosser to string floss, consistently demonstrating that water flossing is more effective than string flossing for better oral health
https://www.nature.com/articles/sj.bdj.2016.653
– The Waterpik Water Flosser and manual toothbrush is significantly more effective than a manual brush and string floss in removing plaque from tooth surfaces
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24282867/
– oral irrigation with water has therapeutic benefits in periodontitis
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10703660/
– There are 70 published research articles that unequivocally show it is safe and effective to use
https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/what-to-do-when-the-evidence-is-lacking/
– When it comes to safety, the water flosser is supported by more than 60 clinical trials and five decades of use by the public. (8) A 2015 review of the safety profile on the water flosser found significant evidence to dispel the myth that water flossing may harm tissues
https://www.dentistryiq.com/products/hygiene/article/16352912/skeptical-about-recommending-a-water-flosser-you-are-not-alone
– The American Dental Association says water flossers with the ADA Seal of Acceptance can get rid of plaque
https://www.webmd.com/oral-health/what-is-waterpik#1
– Research shows that the water flosser does not push bacteria into the periodontal pocket; in fact, the reverse is true
https://www.aegisdentalnetwork.com/cced/2012/04/relevance-of-the-water-flosser-50-years-of-data
– The Waterpik® Water Flosser is clinically proven significantly more effective in numerous independent and university-based studies.
https://www.waterpik.ca/en/oral-health/pro/clinical-research/water-flosser/
https://www.waterpik.ca/en/oral-health/pro/clinical-research/water-flosser/plaque-removal/
– Over 50% More Effective than String Floss for Reducing Gingivitis
https://www.waterpik.com/oral-health/pro/clinical-research/dental-floss-vs-water-flosser-reducing-gingivitis-plaque-barnes-2005/
– Twice as Effective as String Floss for Reducing Gingival Bleeding
https://www.waterpik.com/oral-health/pro/clinical-research/dental-floss-vs-water-flossing-reduce-gingival-bleeding-rosema-2011/
– 29% more effective than string floss for overall plaque removal
https://www.waterpik.com/oral-health/pro/clinical-research/Goyal-Waterpik-vs-String-Floss-for-Plaque-Removal-2013/
